Pros and Cons of Normalization of Israel-Sudan Diplomatic Relations

Between National Interest and Palestine Liberation Solidarity

  • Muhammad Bachrul Ulum UIN Sunan Kalijaga
Keywords: foreign policy, Israel, national interest, normalization, Sudan

Abstract

In 2020, four Arab countries normalized relations with Israel, namely the United Arab Emirates (UAE), Bahrain, Sudan and Morocco. Sudan has been known as a country carrying hard-line Pan-Islamism during the reign of Omar Al-Bashir, so the normalization of relations with Israel is very surprising. Aim of this study is explaining the reasons behind Sudan's agreement to the normalization offer from the US. This study uses a qualitative method with a historical approach to trace the normalization causes and utilizes the concept of "national interest" in foreign policy. This study concludes that Sudan's willingness to normalize its relations with Israel is part of the country's efforts to get off the United States' list of State-Supported Terrorism. The Sudanese government has considered this status as a threat to their national interests, especially in the economic field.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abbas, H.R. (2020). “العلاقات الاسرائيلية مع دولة جنوب السودان وتداعياتها على الأمن القومي العربي.” المركز الديمقراطي العربي. Diambil 17 Januari 2021 (https://www.democraticac.de.w0124385.kasserver.com/?p=67058).

Amin, M. (2021). Sudan signs deal to normalize relations with Israel. Aa.com, [online]. Dalam: https://www.aa.com.tr/en/africa/sudan-signs-deal-to-normalize-relations-with-israel/2100349 [Diakses 24 Februari 2021].

Aljazeera. (2021). Sudan’s cabinet votes to repeal Israel boycott law. [online]. Dalam: https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2021/4/6/sudanese-cabinet-votes-to-repeal-israel-boycott-law [Diakses 23 Februari 2021].

Aljazeera. 2020. “تطبيع السودان وإسرائيل.. حزب المهدي ينفي تصريحات البرهان وواشنطن تمضي بإزالة الخرطوم من قائمة الإرهاب.” [online]. Dalam: (https://www.aljazeera.net/news/politics/2020/10/27/تطبيع-السودان-إسرائيل). [Diakses 23 Februari 2021].

Al-Kareem, I.A. (2012). The Israeli Role in Darfur Crisis. Journal of the Center Palestine Studies, [online] 16, 43-64. Dalam: https://www.iasj.net/iasj/article/64487 [Diakses 23 Februari 2021].

Art, R. J. (2013). A grand strategy for America. New York: Cornell University Press.

Ashaf, M.A. (2016). Akar Epistemik Hegemoni Politik Barat terhadap Nasionalisme di Timur Tengah. Jurnal Penelitian Sosial Keagamaan [online] 24(2). Dalam: https://journal.walisongo.ac.id/index.php/walisongo/article/view/954 [Diakses 23 Februari 2021].

Bainus, A. dan Rachman, J.B. (2018). Kepentingan Nasional dalam Hubungan Internasional. Intermestic: Journal of International Studies, 2(2), 109–15.

BBC. (2010). Omar Bashir: ICC delegation begins talks in Sudan over former leader. [onine]. Dalam: https://www.bbc.com/news/world-africa-54548629 [Diakses 23 Februari 2021].

Burchill, S. (2005). The national interest in international relations theory. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

Burdah, I. (2008). Konflik Timur Tengah. Jakarta: Tiara Wacana.

Burdah, I. (2020). Quo Vadis Dunia Arab Kontemporer? Gerakan Protes, Politik Muslim, Covid-19, dan Arah Perubahan. [online] UIN Sunan Kalijaga. Dalam: https://digilib.uin-suka.ac.id/id/eprint/40806/ [Diakses 23 Februari 2021].

Cahyanti, P. (2017). Analisis Konflik Sudan Dan Sudan Selatan Pasca Referendum Pemisahan Diri Sudan Selatan Dari Sudan. Journal of International Relations, 3(4), 84–95.

Dewinta, R,T,A., Windiani, R., dan Hanura, M. (2016). Peran Organisasi Kerja Sama Islam (OKI) Dalam Menangani Konflik Etnis Rakhine-Rohingya Di Myanmar Tahun 2012-2013. Journal of International Relations, 2(2), 127–34.

dw.com. (2020). Sudan to Normalize Ties with Israel, Says US | DW | 23.10.2020. [online]. Dalam: https://www.dw.com/en/sudan-to-normalize-ties-with-israel-says-us/a-55378202 [Diakses 18 Januari 2021]

Findley, P., Astuti, A., dan Yuliani, L. (1995). Diplomasi munafik ala Yahudi: mengungkap fakta hubungan AS-Israel. Bandung: Mizan.

Guzansky, Y., dan Marshall, Z,A. (2020). The Abraham Accords: Immediate Significance and Long-Term Implications. Israel Journal of Foreign Affairs, 14(3), 379-389.

Haaretz. (2020). Head of Sudan’s Largest Party Slams Recognizing Israel. [online]. Dalam: https://www.haaretz.com/israel-news/head-of-sudan-s-largest-party-slams-recognizing-israel-1.9258920 [Diakses Diambil 18 Januari 2021]

Haris,A,M. (2020). Sudan Kini Sekuler. [online] UIN Surabaya. Dalam: https://w3.uinsby.ac.id/sudan-kini-sekuler/ [Diakses 18 Januari 2021].

Howeidi, F. (2014). Israelis can tell the whole story of Sudan's division - they wrote the script and trained the actors. Middle East Monitor, [online]. Dalam: https://www.middleeastmonitor.com/20140125-israelis-can-tell-the-whole-story-of-sudans-division-they-wrote-the-script-and-trained-the-actors/ [Diakses 20 Februari 2021].

Iqbal, A. (2011). Perang Perang Paling Berpengaruh Didunia. Jogja: Bangkit Publisher.

Islamiyah, N. (2016). Aspek Historis Peranan PBB Dalam Penyelesaian Konflik Palestina-Israel 1967-1995. Avatara , 4(3).

Koren, H. (2019). South Sudan and Israel: A love affair in a changing region?. [online] Dayan. Dalam: https://dayan.org/content/south-sudan-and-israel-love-affair-changing-region [Diakses 18 Januari 2021].

Lesch, Mosely, A., dan Tessler, M. (1989). Israel, Egypt, and the Palestinians. From Camp David to Intifada. Bloomington: Indianapolis.

Masyrofah, M. (2015). Fakta Perjanjian Damai Dan Hubungan Diplomatik Negara Timur Tengah Dalam Proses Perdamaian Konflik Israel-Palestina Pasca Kemerdekaan Palestina. Jurnal Sosial Dan Budaya Syar-i, [online] 2(1). Dalam: http://journal.uinjkt.ac.id/index.php/salam/article/view/2243 [Diakses 20 Maret 2021].

Middle East Monitor. (2020). “Washington: ‘Normalisation Serves Israel Better than Annexation” [online] Dalam: https://www.middleeastmonitor.com/20201003-washington-normalisation-serves-israel-better-than-annexation/. [Diakses 18 Januari 2021].

Nydell, M, K. (2018). Understanding Arabs: A contemporary guide to Arab society. London: Nicholas Brealey.

Ottaway, M., dan El-Sadany, M,. (2012). SUDAN: From conflict to conflict. Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, (8).

Pero, M, D. (2010). The Eccentric Realist: Henry Kissinger and the Shaping of American Foreign Policy. New York: Cornell University Press.

RA, F. Rosyana., Dermawan, W., dan Akim. (2019). Conflict Resolution in South Sudan. Jurnal ICMES, [online] 3(1), 53–74. Dalam: https://doi.org/10.35748/jurnalicmes.v3i1.44 [diakses 18 Februari 2021].

Rehman, A, Ur. (2020). Causes behind the Abraham Accord and Its Consequences for the Peace Process in the Middle East. The Middle East International Journal for Social Sciences (MEIJSS), [online] 2(2), 73-83. Dalam: doi: 10.5281/ZENODO.4314077 [diakses 26 Maret 2021].

Republika. (2020). Sudan Ditekan AS Normalisasi Dengan Israel. [online]. Dalam: https://republika.id/posts/10725/sudan-ditekan-as-normalisasi-dengan-israel%C2%A0 [Diakses 18 Januari 2021].

SD, H. Alunaza, dan Sherin, V. (2018). Pengaruh British Exit (Brexit) terhadap kebijakan pemerintah Inggris terkait masalah imigran. Intermestic: Journal of International Studies 2(2), 156–170. Dalam: doi:10.24198/intermestic.v2n2.4 [Diakses 18 Januari 2021].

Security Council of United Nations. (2003). Resolution 1515 (2003). [online] Dalam: https://undocs.org/S/RES/1515(2003) [Diakses 18 Januari 2021].

Scham, P., dan Lucas, R. (2001). Normalization and Anti-Normalization in Jordan : The Public Debate. Middle East, 5(3), 55.

Seth J, F. (2020). Hezbollah Threatens Sudan over Israel-Sudan Ties. JPost.Com, [online]. Dalam: https://www.jpost.com/arab-israeli-conflict/hezbollah-threatens-sudan-over-israel-sudan-ties-647371 [Diakses 18 Januari 2021].

Sihbudi, M, R. (2007). Menyandera Timur Tengah: Kebijakan AS dan Israel atas Negara-negara Muslim. Bandung: Mizan Hikmah.

State.gov. (2020). Abraham Accords Peace Agreement. [online] Dalam: https://www.state.gov/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/UAE_Israel-treaty-signed-FINAL-15-Sept-2020-508.pdf [Diakses 8 Januari 2021].

Reuters. (2020). Iran Says U.S.-Brokered Sudan-Israel Deal Secured by ‘Ransom. [online] Dalam: https://www.reuters.com/article/uk-sudan-israel-iran-idUSKBN2790B4 [Diakses 24 Februari 2021].

Teitelbaum, J. (2009). The Arab Peace Initiative: A Primer and Future Prospects. Jerusalem: Jerusalem Center of Public Affairs (JCPA)

The Arab Weekly. (2020). Sudanese leaders divided on normalisation with Israel. https://thearabweekly.com/sudanese-leaders-divided-normalisation-israel

Times of Israel. (2021). Sudan Signs ‘Abraham Accords’ with US, Paving Way for Israel Normalization.. [online]. Dalam: https://www.timesofisrael.com/sudan-signs-abraham-accords-with-us-paving-way-for-israel-normalization/ [Diakses 15 Januari 2021].

Totoda, F, F. (2017). Upaya Amerika Serikat dalam Normalisasi Hubungan Diplomatik terhadap Kuba Tahun 2013-2016. Universitas Mulawarman E-Journal, 6(1).

Uca.edu. (t.t). Anglo-Egyptian Sudan (1922-1956). [online]. Dalam: https://uca.edu/politicalscience/dadm-project/middle-eastnorth-africapersian-gulf-region/anglo-egyptian-sudan-1922-1956/ [Diakses 24 Februari 2021].

VOA (Voice of America). (2019). A Timeline of Key Events in Rule of Sudan's al-Bashir. [online] Dalam: https://www.voanews.com/africa/timeline-key-events-rule-sudans-al-bashir [Diakses 25Februari 2021].

Wahiduddin, W. (2020). Konflik Sudan dan Jatuhnya Rezim Omar Al-Bashir. Jurnal Bahasa Arab, 17(1), 50-67.

Wahyudi, N., Basyar, M.H., Mashad, D. dan Ghafur, M.F. (2016). Problematika Kekuatan Politik Islam di Maroko, Sudan, dan Somalia. Jurnal Penelitian Politik, 13(2), 245–60.

Wardani, B. K. (2020). Kebijakan Amerika Serikat Menghapus Embargo Ekonomi Sudan Pada Tahun 2017. Skripsi, Universitas Brawijaya.

Xinhua. (2004). Sudan accuses Israel, Germany of involvement in Darfur conflict. [online] Dalam: https://reliefweb.int/report/sudan/sudan-accuses-israel-germany-involvement-darfur-conflict [Diakses 25 Januari 2021]

Published
2021-06-29
How to Cite
Ulum, M. (2021). Pros and Cons of Normalization of Israel-Sudan Diplomatic Relations. Jurnal ICMES, 5(1), 88-107. https://doi.org/10.35748/jurnalicmes.v5i1.102